Why Aren't Consumers Spending?

One would think given low unemployment, rising wages, still low interest rates, high confidence and a rising wealth effect (thanks to a stock market at record highs and rising home prices) the consumer should be in the sweet spot in terms of spending. Yet we are pestered with such news as Sears declaring bankruptcy and many retailers falling on hard times.

Consumers Spending Less

Weakness can also be seen in the aggregate data, including the recent miss in U.S. retail sales, the fourth consecutive miss relative to tempered consensus expectations. It’s hard not to be a little concerned about the health of the consumer. We see less spending in restaurants, department stores, and gasoline stations.

Big ticket items, namely motor vehicle sales, fell another 3 percent in June, with the seasonally adjusted annual pace now at just 16.41 million. This compares to a cycle high of 18.3 million in June of 2016. Sales are now negative on a year-over-year basis.

Examining the factors that affect consumer spending (table), the consumer should be given an A+. Unemployment is low, wages are growing, inflation remains in check, interest rates are low and confidence is high. The wealth effect should be in high gear. Consumers should be willing to spend more when stocks are making all-time highs and widely held assets such as housing are rising.

With this A+ report card, why is this not transferring into a boon for all retail and consumer stocks? In this first instalment of a two-part Market Ethos series, we will dig into this disconnect. Initially from a macro perspective, and next week discussing changing behavior with portfolio management implications.

 

Credit is Growing, but There Are Cracks

Credit expansion is moving in the right direction: higher. Unfortunately most of it is being driven by auto and student loans. During the past year, consumer credit expanded by $218 billion, yet 68% of this ($149 billion) was from expansion in auto and student loans. Rising auto credit certainly helps the auto industry, but not much beyond this sub-industry. And student credit expansion, well, that won’t help Sears. We’re certainly not seeing the type of pre-crisis behaviour where consumers borrowed heavily to finance their healthy appetite of regular consumption.

Not surprisingly, it’s where we see decent growth that delinquencies remain high. Student-loan delinquencies remain at a high level, though that has flat-lined over the past few years. Auto loan delinquencies are moving higher, as well as a small increase among credit cards. With rates as low as they are, the absolute level is still quite a bit lower versus pre-financial crisis levels. We’re not too concerned with these levels, but a meaningful acceleration would be cause for worry.

 

Read more

 

Learn more about Redwood Tactical Asset Allocation Fund and Redwood Core Income Equity Fund (RDE).

Disclaimer

This material is provided for general information and is not to be construed as an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of securities mentioned herein. Past performance may not be repeated. Every effort has been made to compile this material from reliable sources however no warranty can be made as to its accuracy or completeness. Before acting on any of the above, please seek individual financial advice based on your personal circumstances. However, neither the author nor Richardson GMP Limited makes any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, in respect thereof, or takes any responsibility for any errors or omissions which may be contained herein or accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from any use or reliance on this report or its contents. Richardson GMP Limited is a member of Canadian Investor Protection Fund. Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.

Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS.

FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Redwood Asset Management [and the portfolio manager] believe to be reasonable assumptions, Redwood Asset Management [and the portfolio manager] cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Return to Blog