a subsidiary of Purpose Investments Inc.

Canadian Dollar: Has it Turned?

By Craig Basinger, CFA

 

“When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” – John Maynard Keynes

 

Has the Canadian Dollar Turned?

To determine whether the Canadian dollar is now undervalued, we need to start by outlining where we are coming from. We have been U.S. dollar bulls for over five years. This is most evident in our Core Income mandate that is primarily focused on Canadian dividend-paying companies but can hold up to 35% U.S. companies for better diversification, both at the company level and from a currency perspective.

Our view on the USD/CAD can be easily seen in how much U.S. equity the portfolio has held over time. When we launched the initial SMA strategy in April 2011, we had below 6% U.S. exposure. Two-year yields were higher in Canada than the U.S., the Fed was adding more quantitative easing, their credit rating had been downgraded, there were persistent debt ceiling issues and oil was between $80-100/bbl.

However, in March 2012, we increased our U.S. weight in the portfolio from below 10% to 25% and by October of that same year we were pretty much at our maximum 35% U.S. weight. None of the aforementioned factors had changed; the increase in U.S. holdings was driven from a fundamental valuation perspective.

 

Most Currencies Undervalued vs USD

The top chart on the right shows the Canadian dollar in relation to its maximum and minimum value since a floating exchange rate was adopted. While it is a simplistic approach that ignores factors such as oil prices, yield spread, etc., the chart shows that when close to the maximum (green line), upside has been limited, while when close to the minimum (red line) further downside has been limited.

In 2012, the loonie was close to its record level, implying more upside may prove difficult and there may be greater upside in the undervalued U.S. dollar. Also, based on purchasing power parity, looking at the major country currencies, in 2012 all were overvalued against the U.S. dollar except the Swedish Krona. Today, most are undervalued including the Canadian dollar (bottom chart on the right).

Falling from parity to the mid 70-cent range, having U.S. dollar exposure provided a boost to returns. The problem now is, with the Canadian dollar near the lower end of its historical range and somewhat undervalued vs. the U.S. dollar, should we continue to be bullish on U.S. dollar exposure?

 

Read more 

 

Learn more about Redwood Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (RTA) and Redwood Core Income Equity Fund (RDE)

 

This material is provided for general information and is not to be construed as an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of securities mentioned herein. Past performance may not be repeated. Every effort has been made to compile this material from reliable sources however no warranty can be made as to its accuracy or completeness. Before acting on any of the above, please seek individual financial advice based on your personal circumstances. However, neither the author nor Richardson GMP Limited makes any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, in respect thereof, or takes any responsibility for any errors or omissions which may be contained herein or accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from any use or reliance on this report or its contents. Richardson GMP Limited is a member of Canadian Investor Protection Fund. Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.

Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Redwood Asset Management [and the portfolio manager] believe to be reasonable assumptions, Redwood Asset Management [and the portfolio manager] cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Return to Blog