Canadian Banks Deliver
March 6, 2017
by Gareth Watson, CFA
Over the past two weeks Canadian banks reported their fiscal first quarter earnings which covered results from the months of November to January. All banks beat expectations, and some beat them handily. We observed the following from the bank results:
- Loan loss provisions remained steady for the most part and in some cases even improved.
- Personal and commercial banking results were quite strong even as some banks saw a decline in their net interest margin.
- After a mixed Q4, wholesale (trading and investment banking) operations were fairly strong across the board in Q1.
- Bank capital positions are very strong, while dividend growth track records remain intact.
- Share price performance has been stellar over the past year, but the Canadian economy still faces a number of headwinds down the road.
Loan Loss Provisions
The general trend this quarter was either flat or declining loan loss provisions for Q1, which is something investors always like to see. The one notable exception was TD Bank which saw provisions increase from last quarter and would have seen an increase year-over-year if it had not been for $24 million in recoveries from its wholesale business. Auto loans and credit cards were identified as the main culprits for TD’s provision increase. Royal Bank’s provisions fell materially as that bank posted its lowest total since 2015.
Personal and Commercial Banking
Easily the largest contributor to bank earnings, this segment was quite strong as earnings growth did average in the single digits. However, that is very good considering the size of these businesses, especially when net interest margins ticked downwards. The good news is that we have not seen any material stress in this segment just yet, although continuing earnings growth momentum will be challenging for future quarters.
It would appear the mixed results from last quarter for the wholesale business may have been a blip on the radar screen as almost all banks posted net income improvements both from last quarter and year-over-year. The one exception was Bank of Montreal which saw a small decline in profitability from Q4. For the most part, trading revenues were healthy and investment banking activity was stable.
Capital and Dividends
Tier 1 capital levels for all of the banks increased quarter-over-quarter and in some cases increased significantly, leaving us to conclude that capital levels are solid. With respect to dividend increases, we expected both Bank of Nova Scotia and Royal Bank to increase their dividends as they have done so on a semi-annual basis for some time now. They did not disappoint as Scotia’s quarterly dividend increased from $0.74 to $0.76 while Royal’s increased from $0.83 to $0.87. TD Bank also increased its dividend as expected from $0.55 to $0.60, but their increases now occur on an annual basis. The big surprise of the quarter was CIBC, which bumped its quarterly dividend yet again (from $1.24 to $1.27) and for the 11th time in the past 13 quarters. Admittedly CIBC has been playing catch up with its bank peers as it’s been behind in raising the dividend over the past decade. But its persistence has paid off as it now has a better dividend growth track record than Bank of Montreal over the past ten years and is catching up to Bank of Nova Scotia.
Share Price Performance
The market had priced in high expectations coming into the quarterly reports, so with those expectations met we did not see a great deal of share price movement over the past couple of weeks. However, if we look at share price performance (excluding dividends) over the past year, shareholders can only smile as returns range from 29% to 53% (the TSX has returned 19% over that same period). The question to answer is whether or not this momentum can continue considering that some valuation metrics are high from a historical perspective? While the Canadian economy has bounced back from the commodity shock of early 2016, we still believe it faces headwinds compared to our U.S. neighbours. Private investment at home has declined, consumers have more debt relative to disposal income than ever before, real estate prices remain elevated and eventually this country will have to deal with a rising interest rate environment, albeit not in the immediate future. So there are risks, and the bank CEOs have been highlighting them, but perhaps not risks that will have a material impact on 2017 earnings. Therefore, the market may be giving the banks a pass for now; however, the problems listed above will have to be dealt with eventually. We will continue to monitor the business environment for our banks going forward to determine if and when these headwinds will strengthen, but for now Canadian banks have done a respectable job improving profitability and creating value for shareholders.
Charts are sourced to Bloomberg unless otherwise noted.
This material is provided for general information and is not to be construed as an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of securities mentioned herein. Past performance may not be repeated. Every effort has been made to compile this material from reliable sources however no warranty can be made as to its accuracy or completeness. Before acting on any of the above, please seek individual financial advice based on your personal circumstances. However, neither the author nor Richardson GMP Limited makes any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, in respect thereof, or takes any responsibility for any errors or omissions which may be contained herein or accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from any use or reliance on this report or its contents. Richardson GMP Limited is a member of Canadian Investor Protection Fund. Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.
Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments [and the portfolio manager] believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments [and the portfolio manager] cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.